Fehr, E. & Rockenbach, B. Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature 422, 137–140 (2003).
Herrmann, B., Thoni, C. & Gachter, S. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319, 1362–1367 (2008).
Nikiforakis, N. Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves?. J. Public Econ. 92, 91–112 (2008).
Olson, M. The logic of collective action . Contemporary Sociological Theory124 (2012).
Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158 (2000).
Rand, D. G. & Nowak, M. A. The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. Nat. Commun. 2, 1–7 (2011).
Roth, A. E. & Kagel, J. H. The Handbook of Experimental Economics Vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995).
Dawes, R. M. Social dilemmas. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31, 169–193 (1980).
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302, 1907–1912 (2003).
Falk, A., Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. On the nature of fair behavior. Econ. Inq. 41, 20–26 (2003).
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003).
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 185–190 (2004).
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 159–181 (2000).
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 90, 980–994 (2000).
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002).
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. & Fehr, E. Are people conditionally cooperative? evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ. Lett. 71, 397–404 (2001).
Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A. Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field (MIT Press, Cambridge and London, 2007).
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E. Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 24, 153–172 (2003).
Gintis, H., Henrich, J., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E. Strong reciprocity and the roots of human morality. Soc. Justice Res. 21, 241–253 (2008).
Henrich, J. et al. In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 73–78 (2001).
Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, 1990).
Ledyard, J. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995).
Sigmund, K. The calculus of selfishness. In The Calculus of Selfishness (Princeton Series in Theoretical and Computational Biology). (Princeton University Press, 2010).
Camerer, C. F. & Fehr, E. When does“ economic man’’ dominate social behavior?. Science 311, 47–52 (2006).
Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons: The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968).
Frey, B. S. & Torgler, B. Tax morale and conditional cooperation. J. Comp. Econ. 35, 136–159 (2007).
Keser, C. & Van Winden, F. Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scand. J. Econ. 102, 23–39 (2000).
Baldassarri, D. & Grossman, G. Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 11023–11027 (2011).
Henrich, J. Cooperation, punishment, and the evolution of human institutions. Science 312, 60–61 (2006).
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S. & Richerson, P. J. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 3531–3535 (2003).
De Quervain, D. J. et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004).
De Weerd, H. & Verbrugge, R. Evolution of altruistic punishment in heterogeneous populations. J. Theor. Biol. 290, 88–103 (2011).
Fowler, J. H. Altruistic punishment and the origin of cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 7047–7049 (2005).
Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Effectiveness of conditional punishment for the evolution of public cooperation. J. Theor. Biol. 325, 34–41 (2013).
Ohdaira, T. Evolution of cooperation by the introduction of the probabilistic peer-punishment based on the difference of payoff. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–9 (2016).
Ohdaira, T. Characteristics of the evolution of cooperation by the probabilistic peer-punishment based on the difference of payoff. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 95, 77–83 (2017).
Ohdaira, T. A remarkable effect of the combination of probabilistic peer-punishment and coevolutionary mechanism on the evolution of cooperation. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017).
Ohdaira, T. The probabilistic pool punishment proportional to the difference of payoff outperforms previous pool and peer punishment. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–8 (2022).
Sarkar, R. Decentralised forest governance in central himalayas: A re-evaluation of outcomes. Econ. Pol. Wkly 43, 54–61 (2008).
Hilbe, C., Traulsen, A., Röhl, T. & Milinski, M. Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 752–756 (2014).
Panchanathan, K. & Boyd, R. Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Nature 432, 499–502 (2004).
Liu, L., Chen, X. & Szolnoki, A. Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in a population with probabilistic corrupt enforcers and violators. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 29, 2127–2149 (2019).
Salahshour, M., Oberhauser, V. & Smerlak, M. The cost of noise: Stochastic punishment falls short of sustaining cooperation in social dilemma experiments. PLoS ONE 17, e0263028 (2022).
Battu, B. Evolution of altruistic punishments among heterogeneous conditional cooperators. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–12 (2021).
Bowles, S. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine“ the moral sentiments’’: Evidence from economic experiments. Science 320, 1605–1609 (2008).
Fehr, E. & Falk, A. Psychological foundations of incentives. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46, 687–724 (2002).
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Why social preferences matter-the impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Econ. J. 112, C1–C33 (2002).
Fudenberg, D., Rand, D. G. & Dreber, A. Slow to anger and fast to forgive: Cooperation in an uncertain world. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 720–49 (2012).
Bear, A. & Rand, D. G. Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 936–941 (2016).
Mosleh, M. & Rand, D. G. Population structure promotes the evolution of intuitive cooperation and inhibits deliberation. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–8 (2018).
Szolnoki, A., Xie, N.-G., Wang, C. & Perc, M. Imitating emotions instead of strategies in spatial games elevates social welfare. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 96, 38002 (2011).
Szolnoki, A., Xie, N.-G., Ye, Y. & Perc, M. Evolution of emotions on networks leads to the evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas. Phys. Rev. E 87, 042805 (2013).
Rand, D. G., Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Fudenberg, D. & Nowak, M. A. Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science 325, 1272–1275 (2009).
Shirado, H. & Christakis, N. A. Network engineering using autonomous agents increases cooperation in human groups. Iscience 23, 101438 (2020).
Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 92, 38003 (2010).
Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Evolutionary advantages of adaptive rewarding. New J. Phys. 14, 093016 (2012).
Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Correlation of positive and negative reciprocity fails to confer an evolutionary advantage: Phase transitions to elementary strategies. Phys. Rev. X 3, 041021 (2013).
Ohdaira, T. Cooperation evolves by the payoff-difference-based probabilistic reward. Eur. Phys. J. B 94, 1–8 (2021).
Traxler, C. & Spichtig, M. Social norms and the indirect evolution of conditional cooperation. J. Econ. 102, 237–262 (2011).
Gavrilets, S. & Richerson, P. J. Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 6068–6073 (2017).
Ohdaira, T. Coevolution between the cost of decision and the strategy contributes to the evolution of cooperation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–9 (2019).
Hauert, C., Traulsen, A., Brandt, H., Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Via freedom to coercion: The emergence of costly punishment. Science 316, 1905–1907 (2007).
Hauert, C., De Monte, S., Hofbauer, J. & Sigmund, K. Volunteering as red queen mechanism for cooperation in public goods games. Science 296, 1129–1132 (2002).
Hauert, C., De Monte, S., Hofbauer, J. & Sigmund, K. Replicator dynamics for optional public good games. J. Theor. Biol. 218, 187–194 (2002).
Tavoni, A., Dannenberg, A., Kallis, G. & Löschel, A. Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 11825–11829 (2011).
Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Evolutionary dynamics of biological games. Science 303, 793–799 (2004).
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. In A Cooperative Species (Princeton University Press, 2011).
McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L. & Smith, V. L. Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 52, 267–275 (2003).
Battu, B., Pammi, V. & Srinivasan, N. Evolution of cooperation with heterogeneous conditional cooperators. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–7 (2018).
Battu, B. & Srinivasan, N. Evolution of conditional cooperation in public good games. Royal Soc. Open Sci. 7, 191567 (2020).
Schmelz, K. & Bowles, S. Overcoming covid-19 vaccination resistance when alternative policies affect the dynamics of conformism, social norms, and crowding out. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2104912118 (2021).
Blair, M. M. & Stout, L. A. Trust, trustworthiness, and the behavioral foundations of corporate law. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 149, 1735–1810 (2001).
Gambetta, D., Gambetta, D. et al. Can we Trust Trust. In Gambetta, D., Ed., Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations13, 213–237 (2000).
Fehr, E. Behavioral foundations of corporate culture (University of Zurich, Public Paper, 2018).
Frey, B. S. & Meier, S. Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing“ conditional cooperation’’ in a field experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 1717–1722 (2004).
Rustagi, D., Engel, S. & Kosfeld, M. Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 330, 961–965 (2010).
Turner, M. A. & Smaldino, P. E. Stubborn extremism as a potential pathway to group polarization. In the 42nd Annual Virtual Meeting of the Cognitive Science (2020).
Centola, D., Becker, J., Brackbill, D. & Baronchelli, A. Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention. Science 360, 1116–1119 (2018).
Efferson, C., Vogt, S. & Fehr, E. The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 55–68 (2020).
Iacopini, I., Petri, G., Baronchelli, A. & Barrat, A. Group interactions modulate critical mass dynamics in social convention. Commun. Phys. 5, 1–10 (2022).
Kocher, M. G., Cherry, T., Kroll, S., Netzer, R. J. & Sutter, M. Conditional cooperation on three continents. Econ. Lett. 101, 175–178 (2008).
Hauert, C. & Szabó, G. Game theory and physics. Am. J. Phys. 73, 405–414 (2005).
Gächter, S., Kölle, F. & Quercia, S. Reciprocity and the tragedies of maintaining and providing the commons. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 650–656 (2017).
Nowak, M. A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006).
Nakahashi, W., Wakano, J. Y. & Henrich, J. Adaptive social learning strategies in temporally and spatially varying environments. Hum. Nat. 23, 386–418 (2012).
Perc, M. et al. Statistical physics of human cooperation. Phys. Rep. 687, 1–51 (2017).
Szabó, G. & Fath, G. Evolutionary games on graphs. Phys. Rep. 446, 97–216 (2007).